On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:46 AM, <Tolice1234@aol.com> wrote:
> I also informed these morons, ( yes ) that they in fact were mistaken. Our
> rights state that if an object that is to be photographed is in clear and
> plain sight, on public land or in the air or out at sea, it can be
> photographed without interference from Law Enforcement , regardless of what
> it is. I also explained to them that their actions could lead to
> disciplinary charges against the officers of conduct unbecoming of an
> officer. I stated to them , that taking my camera away from me was against
> the law, going through the images is a first amendment violation, and just
> the fact that they took it at their own discretion, without any prior orders
> given by the dept. that the taking of the camera when no crime has been
> committed , is no different than if they walked up to your front door of
> your home , and opened it and walked inside.
...so how did that go over with them? :)
Matt
(BNA)
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cactuswings" group.
To post to this group, send email to cactus-wings@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cactus-wings+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cactus-wings?hl=en.
0 comments:
Post a Comment